Survin's Cognition and Estrangement (1979)


Finally, the last postmodern concept regards that of Survin and his Cognitive Estrangement theory (1979). Darko Suvin is a leading theorist in science fiction and his ground-breaking notion concerning science fiction in comparison to utopian fiction, which he describes as a “developed oxymoron, a realistic irreality” (Survin in Keyes, 2006). However, in 1979 Survin defines science fiction as,
 “A literary genre or verbal construct whose necessary are the presence and interaction of estrangement and cognition and whose main device is an imaginative framework alternative to the author’s empirical environment” (Survin, 1979, p.190).
The first thing to note in Survin’s theory surrounds the genre itself “the importance of science fiction in our time is on the increase ... there are strong indications that its popularity in the leading industrial nations has risen sharply” (Survin, 1979, p.187) indicating a generated interest to new social groups and encouraging a new way at thinking about the way human societies work with a new insight who “appreciative of [to] a new sets of values” (Survin, 1979, p.188) which suggests that through examining these new worlds we are able to analyse our own with a new perspective. It is a matter of defamiliarization; another concept Adorno supports “estrangement shows itself precisely in the elimination of distance between people” (Adorno in Berry, 2014) this is an idea that all three notions consider Adorno’s Culture Industry and its distance from the truth, Baudrillard’s Simulacra and Simulation is its distance from reality and here it resides in the distance of people. All in all it is a structuralist approach to attempt to define such a genre and distinguish it from other forms of fiction.
The theory is split into three parts, in n the first section of his theory he marks the devices of cognitive estrangement and a term he calls the ‘narrative novum’ which is the presence of the story; such things involved are things “significantly different from what is the norm in ‘naturalistic’ or empiricist fiction” (Survin, 1979, p.188). Examples of these scientific novum include time travel, invasion from outer space, radical scientific breakthrough, mutations and hyper-intelligent AI’s, any concept within scientific reason; it is these concepts that help us challenge what we consider familiar using this as a platform to contemplate a new understanding, through the creation of these external worlds. The second section centres on how “Estrangement differentiates SF from the ‘realistic’ literary mainstream” (Survin, 1979, p.190) and that this type of literature is not bound to the author’s empirical world but explores many cognitive possibilities from myth, folktale and fantasy. Survin argues that science fiction “does not use imagination as a means of understanding the tendencies latent in reality” (Survin, 1979, p.190) this is an attempt to acknowledge a distinct practice of science fiction relating to the period in time in which the literature was devised, Seed agrees with Survin that “science fiction and utopias are closely interrelated through their development ... according to the historical urgencies of their period’s” (Seed, 2011, p.128). A following section of Survin’s cognitive estrangement theory concentrates on the concept of science fiction and its functions “As a  fully fledged literary genre, SF has its own repertory of functions, conventions, and devices” (Survin, 1979, p.191) proves that this developing literary genre has also growing prestige. The final section of Survin’s article discusses the growing anticipation of the science fiction genre after its initial disregard “into a reservation or ghetto which was protective and is now constrictive” (Survin, 1979, p.192) to a now established and updated genre with subgenres containing artificial intelligence, disasters, time travel, aliens and such. Survin proposes  that this classification of literature can create “deeper and more lasting sources of enjoyment, also presupposes more complex and wider cognitions” (Survin. 1979, p.192) a notion that Adorno proposes in his theory of culture industry (1944) where he suggests that greater satisfaction would come from those proceedings that stimulated new areas of cognition like what Survin recommends with science fiction, prompting a new way of thinking.
 
 
Berry, M, D. (2014) Critical Theory and the Digital. London: Bloomsbury.
Keyes, F. (2006) The Literature of Hope in the Middle Ages and Today: Connections in Medieval Romance, Modern Fantasy, and Science Fiction. North Carolina and London: McFarland & Company Inc.
Seed, D. (2011) Science Fiction: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Survin, D. (1979) ‘Cognition and Estrangement’, in Metamorphoses of Science Fiction. New Haven: Yale University Press.
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment